answersLogoWhite

0

concurring judgment A concurring judgment is one in which the reasoning is different, but not the end result. (A dissenting judgment, however, is one that differs in the result from that of the majority.)

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When a justice agrees with the majority decision but for differing reasons he or she might write a?

concurring opinion. In a concurring opinion, a justice expresses agreement with the outcome reached by the majority but provides their own reasoning or interpretation of the law. This allows the justice to emphasize specific points or provide alternative legal analysis.


How can making be harmful?

because the inference might be based on poor reasoning


What is an example sentence of justice?

One might be - "We will bring the killer to justice". Another might be - Yet again, the justice system had failed the people.


How might communication express how someone is feeling and how might this affect others?

Express how some one is feeling and how could this affect others


If a supreme court justice were to disagree with the majority opinion which issue would be most important in forming the dissent?

A supreme court justice may prioritize issues related to constitutional interpretation, the protection of individual rights, or the implications of the ruling on precedent. The dissent could focus on concerns about the majority's approach to legal principles, potential societal impacts, or the integrity of judicial processes. Ultimately, the justice might emphasize the need for a more nuanced understanding of the law or a stronger commitment to upholding civil liberties.


How can making inferences be harmful?

because the inference might be based on poor reasoning


Where can you download husky express?

Husky Express is down, but there MIGHT be enough fan messages saying they want it back, so it might come out in English.


How can you use faulty reasoning to determine if a statement is a fact or an opinion?

Faulty reasoning might accidentally lead to the right answer. Different parts in the faulty reasoning may cancel each other out. If faulty reasoning consistently gives the correct answer, then it is opinion and not fact that the reasoning was faulty in the first place. Research is the best method to determine opinion from facts.


Where can you download husky express game?

Husky Express is down, but there MIGHT be enough fan messages saying they want it back, so it might come out in English.


What store sells denim vests?

justice might have them


A candidate who gets 45 of the vote might have a?

Majority


How might judicial review override the will of the majority?

The majority is white people right now but in a few years blacks and Mexicans will be the majority while white people will be the minority!