answersLogoWhite

0

C. Public officials can regulate the time, place, and conditions of public assembly, provided the regulations are reasonable.

key word- reasonable.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What supreme court justice was known to advocate the absolute position regarding freedom of expression?

Hugo Black and William Douglas


What are the 5 first amendment freedoms?

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court tells us how far these rights may be extended.


Which right was named by the Supreme Court as part of the freedoms of assembly and petition?

The Supreme Court recognized the right to "freedom of assembly" as part of the First Amendment, which includes the right to gather peacefully for demonstrations and protests. This right is closely linked to the freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances, allowing individuals to express their views and advocate for change collectively. Together, these rights ensure that citizens can engage in public discourse and political participation.


Do corporations have freedom of speech according to the law?

Yes, corporations have freedom of speech rights protected by the law, as established by the Supreme Court in various rulings, including the Citizens United case.


What are three court cases on freedom of assembly?

Three notable court cases on freedom of assembly include Cox v. New Hampshire (1941), where the Supreme Court upheld the state's requirement for permits for public parades, emphasizing the government's ability to regulate time, place, and manner. In NAACP v. Alabama (1958), the Court ruled that the state could not require the NAACP to disclose its membership lists, as it would suppress the right to assemble freely. Lastly, in City of Chicago v. Morales (1999), the Supreme Court struck down an anti-loitering ordinance that restricted public gatherings, affirming the importance of protecting freedom of assembly.


The supreme court decision in shenck v the united states most affected?

freedom of speech


What did The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v the US most affect?

Freedom of speech


Who was the slave that sued for freedom in supreme court?

Dred Scott


What was the outcome of the Supreme Court case regarding the Jehovah's Witness pledge of allegiance?

In the 1940s, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jehovah's Witnesses, stating that they cannot be forced to salute the flag or recite the Pledge of Allegiance due to their religious beliefs. This decision upheld their First Amendment right to freedom of speech and religion.


Who was the slave that sued for his freedom in the supreme court?

Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court in the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857. The Supreme Court decision ruled against granting him his freedom and also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens.


Who was the slave who asked the supreme court for freedom and was denied?

Dred Scott


Whose lawsuit for freedom was denied by the supreme court?

Dred Scott