0
What else can I help you with?
What is a antonym for military base?
An antonym for "military base" could be "civilian area" or "peaceful community." While a military base is associated with defense, training, and military operations, a civilian area typically denotes a space meant for non-military, everyday life activities.
Can a child of a civilian contractor attend school on military base per US military regulations?
Yes, a child of a civilian contractor can attend school on a military base, provided they meet certain eligibility criteria outlined by the military's regulations. Typically, access to on-base schools is granted to dependents of military personnel and some civilian employees, including contractors, depending on the specific agreement and the availability of space. It's essential for the contractor to verify their eligibility with the base's education office.
Did medical persons did die in Pearl Harbor?
Yes, medical people (military & some civilian) are a part of all military forces. Civilian staff are used in base hospitals. Medical staff often face the same dangers as other military or civilian people in any attack, especially an aerial attackas at Pearl Harbor.
What was the price of cigarettes in 1968 military base?
In 1968, the price of cigarettes on military bases in the United States was typically around 25 cents per pack. This price was significantly lower than the average retail price in civilian stores at the time, reflecting the military's subsidized pricing for service members. Prices could vary slightly depending on the specific base and brand of cigarettes.
Does a civilian contractor in a military base have base privileges?
Civilian contractors on a military base typically have limited access and privileges compared to active-duty military personnel and their families. Their privileges often depend on the specific contract terms, the base's security policies, and the nature of their work. While they may access certain areas relevant to their job, they generally do not have full base privileges, such as access to recreational facilities or base housing. It’s essential for contractors to be familiar with the specific regulations and guidelines of the base they are working on.
Is the US Constitution fully applicable in a military base as a US territory?
Yes. The U.S. Constitution applies as the supreme law in ANY place that the U.S. has jurisdiction, regardless of whether military or civilian law applies. Now, the exact details of how the Constitution applies in specific cases can vary, depending on the situation. In addition, military law applies over civilian law when on a U.S. military base, rather than a U.S. territory (where only civilian law applies).
Can civilian police pull over military police?
Yes. When Military Police are off base and violating the law, they can be stopped by civilian police. If it is determined that a law violation did occur, then they can be ticketed, but police rarely ticket on-duty officers from other departments.
What are the rights of a U.S. citizen on a military base?
U.S. military bases fall under military jurisdiction, thus, any potential infraction is prosecuted under the Uniform Code of Military Justice first, then standard U.S. (civilian) law if no UCMJ infraction occured (there are certain crimes which are only crimes under civilian law, not military law). Non-military individuals normally subject just to ordinary civilian law retain all their normal rights under U.S. law, with the stipulation that certain extra restrictions are allowed, due to the circumstances of being on a military base. For instance, while on-base, a normal u.s. civilian citizen cannot be prosecuted for calling the base commander (to his face) an "incompenet loser unfit for command" (which very well might be a crime for military personnel to do), but they may be restricted from picketted the commander's office with placard signs and chanting slogans.
What Military base closed in 1994?
In 1994, the U.S. military base that closed was the Naval Air Station (NAS) Alameda, located in California. The base was officially decommissioned as part of the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process aimed at downsizing military installations. Its closure marked the end of over 50 years of naval aviation operations at the site. The land has since been redeveloped for civilian use.
What is a military arrest?
"Military arrest" is often used to mean that a civilian is taken into military custody.However, the civilian term "arrest" is termed "apprehension" by the military, being the physical act of detaining a violator of law.The term "arrest" means the notification of an individual that charges will be sought in connection with an offense. In most cases, this entails restriction to quarters while the legal process proceeds.The actual definition is Arrest : "moral restraint imposed on a person by oral or written orders of the competent authority, limiting the person's personal liberty pending disposition of the charges."
If two civilans get into a fight on a military base can they go to jail for assault?
...Yes. Normaly the MP's will detain them until civilian authorities can respond and arrest them.The Authority to arrest on a military base is solely with the Military, but they often will remand authority to the County Sheriff's department, or local Police depending on a pre-arranged agreement between the military (specificaly the base commander) and local governments in the event of civilians being involved.
When does civilian law supersede military law?
Civilian law is typically always in place. Military law is only invoked in extreme emergencies. However, military personnel are always subject to military law. The Adjutant General will negotiate with the civilian authorities if there is any situation where it is not definite as to which takes precedence. Actually, in the United States, no military person (or, for that matter, anyone other than the Judical Branch) can arbitrarily decide to enforce military law in a place where it is not currently in place. Not even the President can decide to apply military law in a place where civil law is currently in force (indeed, this is one of the major contentious issues around the classification of terrorists as "enemy combatants", and the legality of this move is still being subject to litigation). The misnowmer "martial law" does not actually apply Military Law, but rather enforce a certain subsection of civilian law. For instance, let's say that there is major rioting in a city, and the National Guard is called in to restore order, and "martial law" is declared by the city's major (or perhaps, the state governor). Members of the National Guard are subject to Military law, and any infractions they commit will naturally be covered by military trial. HOWEVER, should a National Guardsman capture a looter (or other criminal), they are then prosecuted under CIVILIAN LAW, even though "martial law" was declared. Martial law in this case is a specific subsection of civilian law, which criminalizes certain activities which are normally permissible under ordinary civilian law. Back to the original question: as Congress is the creator of both military and civilian law, it can decide whether civilian or military law applies in a situation where the military normally has first jurisdiction. There are a myriad number of places this can occur, so naming them all is not possible. In addition, the Constitution is still the highest law of the land, and is supreme over both military and civilian law. Do note that many crimes are not covered by military law, but only civilian law, so it is entirely possible for a person normally subject to military jurisdiction to be prosecuted by civilian authorities without military acquiecence. For example, Insider Trading is a civilian crime, with no military equivalent, so it would be entirely possible to charge a military serviceperson on a military base with this civilian crime.
