The FDA can not be held liable for injuries from drug side effects. Those responsible for a liability are the manufactures that produce the products and even medical professionals.
no. it would be the nurse who is liable. the nurse was acting illegally in the first place.
yes, i cant see any reason for them not to be liable, if someone suffers death, injury or loss of sight, hearing ect. from medication in any way, the hospice can and should be held liable.
Yes, I may be held liable for my actions
you can be held liable if you do not report it before the crime takes place however a investigation will take place before you are charged and if you are innocent you wont be held liable.
Who else do you think should be held liable?
Yes, they can be held liable for theft. It is a breach of fiduciary duty and is a crime.
An attractive nuisance is a hazardous object or condition which is likely to attract children who are unable to appreciate the risk posed by the object or condition, and to whom the landowner can be held liable for injuries.
An attractive nuisance is a hazardous object or condition which is likely to attract children who are unable to appreciate the risk posed by the object or condition, and to whom the landowner can be held liable for injuries.
can the executor be liable for estate tax
Yes, they could be held liable, but only if the negligence is contributable to a loss
Nope... The passenger's actions are their own ! If they choose to open the door of a moving vehicle - they are responsible for their own injuries !
NoBut you may not be criminally responsible, or put another way you may not get sent to jail.Added: However you, and/or your insurance company, WILL be held financially responsible for the the damages and/or injuries you may have caused.