Yes they can!
1917 or maybey 1918
All Romans citizens could vote. The Roman social orders were: patricians, equites and plebeians.
it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections
they could be drafted into the military at that age.
For citizens, no, never. That would be an infringement on federal citizenship in the USA which grants all citizens the right to be present in any state of the union. For non citizens, the federal government could restrict the an alien to certain states under its authority to regulate immigration. However, the federal government and/or a judge, state or federal, could only do so if Congress enacted a law providing for this. And only for non-citizens.
Under the Constitution, the federal courts have jurisdiction over a number of kinds of suits involving state citizens. Since Dred Scott's case involved citizens of different states, the chief justice could have said that free blacks in states that considered them citizens could bring certain cases into federal courts.
Australia's government can be described as democratic, federal, and accountable. It operates as a representative democracy with a parliamentary system, where power is divided between national and state governments. The government emphasizes transparency and accountability to its citizens through regular elections and checks and balances.
In addition to the 15th Amendment, which prohibits denying the right to vote based on race, and the 19th Amendment, which grants women the right to vote, the 24th Amendment eliminated poll taxes in federal elections, ensuring that financial barriers could not prevent citizens from voting. The 26th Amendment further expanded suffrage by lowering the voting age from 21 to 18, allowing younger citizens to participate in elections. These amendments collectively enhanced democratic participation in the United States.
The fact that they have gotten very little federal help since the hurricane and they are citizens of the United States could be one reason. With statehood they would also paying federal taxes while today they don’t.
There are many ways Americans can participate in their democracy. Three of these are: voting in Federal, State and local elections; running for office in Federal, State, or local elections; and communicating with our elected representatives concerning matters important to us.
Could be University Board of Elections
The Twenty-sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.The Twenty-sixth Amendment was proposed on March 23, 1971, and ratified on July 1, 1971. The ratification period of 107 days was the shortest in U.S. history. The amendment, which lowered the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen, was passed quickly to avert potential problems in the 1972 elections.The drive for lowering the voting age began with young people who had been drawn into the political arena by the Vietnam War. Proponents argued that if eighteen-year-olds were old enough to be drafted into military service and sent into combat, they were also old enough to vote. This line of argument was not new. It had persuaded Georgia and Kentucky to lower the minimum voting age to eighteen during World War II. The one flaw in the argument was that women were not drafted and were not allowed to serve in combat units if they enlisted in the armed forces.Nevertheless, the drive for lowering the voting age gained momentum. In 1970 Congress passed a measure that lowered the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen in both federal and state elections (84 Stat. 314).The U.S. Supreme Court, however, declared part of this measure unconstitutional in Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 91 S. Ct. 260, 27 L. Ed. 2d 272 (1970). The decision was closely divided. Four justices believed Congress had the constitutional authority to lower the voting age in all elections, four justices believed the opposite, and one justice, Hugo l. black, concluded that Congress could lower the voting age by statute only in federal elections, not in state elections.The Court's decision allowed eighteen-yearolds to vote in the 1972 presidential and congressional elections but left the states to decide if they wished to lower the voting age in their state elections. The potential for chaos was clear. Congress responded by proposing the Twenty-sixth Amendment, which required the states as well as the federal government to lower the voting age to eighteen.