Filibusters are LESS likely to occur in the House of Representatives THAN the Senate, for two reasons: firstly, the number of people in the 'House' is 435 and in the Senate there are 100 - the simple fact that more voters makes it less likely for a Filibuster to occur, and secondly, there are and ODD number of Voting members in the 'House' as opposed to an EVEN number in the Senate - again, making it MORE likely for a Filibuster to occur in the Senate.
It depends on the specific state's constitution. Many states have two houses in the legislature as in the US Congress (a state senate and a state house of representatives).
Members of the Senate have more responsibilities than members of the House, since they are numerically fewer (100 compared to 435).
Well, its most likely because there are more people in that state, its most likely that more people of that state will be a representatives than a state with low population. Example: California has more people in the state so it most likely has more representatives, Alaska has low population and, because of that, that state doesn't have many representatives.
I suppose a sitting President could be indicted and tried in general court, but what is far more likely is that if strong evidence of a crime arose against the President, he would first be impeached by the House of Representatives and then tried by the US Senate. If convicted he would be removed from office and then could be tried in the appropriate court like any other citizen.
The Senate allows for continuity and not a wholesale replacement every two years. The more populated House is less likely to lose many people and have as many newcomers.
In the US, it would be difficult for this to happen due to the way the election process works. However, in the event that no candidate receives a simple majority of the electoral vote (much more likely, and in fact it's happened twice), the president is determined by vote in the House of Representatives, with each state, regardless of the number of representatives, having only one vote.
You can send it to congress/ Senate, which delivers it to the Branches to read, but most likely they will not get to read yours on time, because with all the topics this decade brings, massive piles of letters are knocking to the doors of congress, so you could take the stand in opening speeches in your state, like texas and explain it to your representatives or mayor.
To expedite his agenda , and to bypass congress .
The likely word is "representatives" (officials of a legislature, or agents).
The senate elects a president pro tempore who is the longest serving majority Senator. There are also majority and minority Senate leaders. Unless there is a vote and a tie occurs, it does not matter much who chairs the Senate and members take turns presiding . If a tie vote seems likely, the vice- president will be there more than likely.
Both were acquitted when tried in the US Senate. Clinton expectedly because no Democratic senators voted with the Republican majority. Johnson avoided removal by just one vote.The word "impeachment" actually refers to the accusal(indictment by the House), rather than a conviction. The House of Representatives has to vote to impeach, and the Senate has to vote for conviction. The resignation by Richard Nixon in 1974 avoided both an impeachment and very likely a conviction.
The main reason for Senators having longer terms than House members is to provide stability. It also, theoretically, makes Senators less likely to be influenced by outside forces.