Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) was a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of federal versus state power in regulating interstate commerce. The Court ruled that the federal government had the exclusive authority to regulate interstate navigation, thereby reinforcing the supremacy of federal law over state law in matters affecting interstate commerce. This decision set a significant precedent for the expansion of federal regulatory power.
The commerce clause
ruling* Gibbons v. Ogden*
the court defined interstate
the court defined interstate
The Supreme Court of the turks & caicos isalnds postal address
The US Supreme Court made a decision in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824). See Related Questions, below, for a discussion of that decision.
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the State of New York's decision on this case. The Court found that the power to regulate navigation fell under the existing rules concerning interstate commerce.
The Supreme Court generally responds to press confidentiality issues by deferring or deflecting them. In most cases, the Supreme Court does not want to respond to issues of press confidentiality.
Gibbons believed that Congress had exclusive power over interstate commerce, which is the reason for why he appealed to the Supreme Court after other courts issued an injunction restricting Gibbons' boat operations.
Gibbons v. Ogden was argued before the US Supreme Court on February 5, 1924, and the Court released its decision on March 2, 1824. Gibbons established Congress had sole constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.
Gibbons v. Ogden is the name of the case that resulted in the Supreme Court in a ruling that grants Congress board powers over interstate commerce.