because cats have dragon breath (they breathe fire) and if your cat proves to be really noisy then it is either trying to tell you about its fiery breath or trying to set you on fire but their breath isn't working.
Yes the houses rely did get set on fire. If you search google images you can even find newspapers talking about them.
The British set fire to some of the houses in Lexington.
He tried the blow up the Houses of Parliament in London but he did not succeed.
This plot occured in 1605.
People usually make big bonfires and set off fireworks. It is all a celebration that Guy Falks didn't set the Houses Of parlament of fire.
Most of the vikings yes, but the others just killed the people and ate them, if they were hungry.
It is arson. Arson is a crime and results in prison time. When a arson fire is set it can destroy an area or town.
A combustible material can be set on fire. You can also set a frying pan on (a) fire.
I would say ice is not easily set on fire.
Not really; it's primarily a matter of opinion. You could hypothetically set up a series of metrics for what constitutes a "better pet" and test cats and dogs against those metrics, but the final answer will really say more about you than about dogs and cats because it will be based on what you consider to be ideal qualities in a pet (for example, if one of your metrics is "does not whine to be let out" then cats are going to do better than if one of them is "can stop burglars from breaking in").
Yes, Ashfur did start the fire in the forest in the Warrior Cats series by Erin Hunter. He set the blaze in an attempt to frame another cat for the crime and seek revenge.
An iPod will not catch fire by itself, but you can set an iPod on fire.