Enemies.
As a soldier and a statesman he certainly did.
George Washington
If by permanent you mean in the extremely long-term (hundreds of years or more), then no, since the nature of relations between states has largely fluctuated based not only on past outcomes but future potentialities. That is, while some groups may be friends or enemies for a long time, given enough time, there is almost always some issue or problem that will emerge against them simply due to sheer probability.
Armenia, Greece, Russia, and Chinaall from historical perspective. Maybe not so bad today.
The British The British The British The British Gaile NO; because once George Washington help the British during the French and Indian war
King George iii and George Washington were both political leaders. They both wore powdered wigs. They were both enemies. They were faithful to their wives. (that's all I have)
I want you too answer it....... michelle flabib
King George iii and George Washington were both political leaders. They both wore powdered wigs. They were both enemies. They were faithful to their wives. (that's all I have)
They hate Britain because it used to be a hegemonic empire. It used to dominated a large portion of the world. In this process, Britain made a lot of permanent enemies.
Nouns do not describe, adjectives are the words that describe nouns. The word 'enemies' is a noun Three nouns that are synonyms for enemies, then here you go. 1. Foes 2. Fiends 3. Opponents
George Washington referred to Shays' Rebellion as a triumph for the nation's enemies because it exposed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and demonstrated the potential for disorder and discontent among the populace. The rebellion highlighted the inability of the federal government to maintain order and protect property rights, which could be exploited by foreign adversaries. Washington believed that the unrest could undermine the credibility of the young nation and embolden those who opposed its stability and governance.