The suspect is advised of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney.
If they do not wish to voluntarily confess, they can exercise any of their rights and not confess.
It doesn't "prevent" anything. It only gives the suspect an opportunity not to speak.
The Miranda Warning is only issued by a commissioned Law Enforcement Officer. If by "Security Officer", you mean a private security guard, then no, they are never required to issue a Miranda Warning.
Interrogation plays a crucial role in intelligence gathering as it allows law enforcement to extract critical information from suspects or witnesses that can aid in investigations and prevent future crimes. The Miranda warnings include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything said can be used against them in court. Key U.S. Supreme Court cases affecting Miranda warning requirements include Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which established the need for these rights to be communicated, and Dickerson v. United States (2000), which reaffirmed the necessity of Miranda warnings.
silent
Non-arrest situations. If you arrest someone, you give the Miranda Warning.
It seems to be used this way: Miranda warning, or Miranda rights. Miranda is capitalized because it is the last name of the defendant who sued to bring these rights into law.
During an investigation, an individual may be put into custody and interrogated. An individual who is in custody (or is not free to leave), and is being subjected to incriminating questions, is required to be advised of their Miranda Rights.
No. Miranda is only given if you are in custody AND they are going to interrogate you.
silly
No. A Probation Officer is not a Law Enforcement Officer. Only Law Enforcement Officers are required to give the Miranda Warning.
None of the amendments specifically mention the Miranda Warning; however, when a suspect's rights have been violated, the defense will cite a violation of the 5th and/or 14th amendment/s.
Yes. All states have that requirement.