It doesn't.
No, if both persons are in inertial frames of reference the situation is completely symmetric so the 'paradox' does not occur. Also note that it is not really a paradox because general relativity has a conclusive answer to what happens to the twins. It is; however, not possible to set up a twin paradox-like situation with neither twin never leaving an inertial frame. This is because if they want to move apart, and come back again, they need to accelerate somehow, and the act of acceleration causes you to leave an inertial frame.
The twin paradox is a scenario in special relativity where one twin travels through space at high speeds and ages less than the other twin who stays on Earth. Gravitational time dilation, on the other hand, is the effect of gravity on the passage of time, causing time to run slower in stronger gravitational fields. The twin paradox is related to relative motion, while gravitational time dilation is related to differences in gravitational potential.
It is not common for one male twin to be sterile while the other is fertile. However, if one twin has a specific health condition or genetic disorder that affects fertility, it is possible for them to be sterile while their twin is not affected.
The twin paradox solution explains how time dilation occurs when one twin travels at high speeds in space, causing them to age slower than the twin who stays on Earth. This resolves the discrepancy in their ages when they reunite, as the traveling twin experiences less time passing due to their faster speed.
He has his mother and father. In The Time Paradox, he has two twin baby brothers.
A human can only have one head ... Unless you're a Siamese twin ...
LaRhae Knatterud has written: 'Summary of human investment in the Twin Cities area' -- subject(s): Human services, Finance 'Inventory of human investment in the Twin Cities area' -- subject(s): Human services, Quality of life
This is a psychological question rather than a pregnancy one. My husband is an identical twin, and we have fraternal twin son/daughter. when asked what it is like being a twin they can't say, any more than I can say what it is like to be a singleton. Elvis Presley was a twin, his twin died at birth.
No, but you can guess better than any other human being.
Father used that voice before he killed the twin.
It isn't truly a paradox. Here's the problem: A spaceship leaves earth for a trip at high relativistic velocity. Aboard is one twin, the other having remained on earth. The ship is moving away from earth at high speed, and returns to earth at high speed, therefore it's time is dilated, so the twin on the ship ages more slowly and should return to earth having aged less than his earthbound counterpart. However, from the perspective of the ship, it is the earth that is moving away at high velocity, and the earthbound twin should be the one aging more slowly. The paradox dissolves when the nature of each frame of reference is taken into account. The earth is an inertial frame of reference. The spaceship, since it must undergo several positive and negative accelerations to make the round trip, is a non-inertial frame. Only the viewpoint from the intertial frame is valid. The explanation is far too long and involved to go into here, but you will find one of the best and most detailed explanations in Paul Davies' book "About Time" on pages 62 to 65.
Most probably because someone is mistaken about the year of birth or in the calculations. In theory, the twin paradox (due to relativity) could have a similar effect but we cannot, as yet, travel at the required velocities.