0
John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.
What else can I help you with?
How did Alexander hamilton and thomas jeffersons views towards the interpretation of the constitution differ?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How did Alexander Hamilton and and Thomas Jeffersons views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas jeffersons views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How was John Marshalls interpretation of the Constitution different from that of Thomas Jefferson's?
Marshall believed the Constitution implied strong state powers; Jefferson did not.
How did hamiltons and jeffersons views toward the interpretation of the constitution different?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How was john marshalls interpretation of the constitution different from thomas jeffersons?
John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.
How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas Jefferson's view towards the interpretation of the constitution?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas Jefferson's views toward the interpretation of the constitution?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas Jefferson's towards the interpretation of the constitution differ?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas Jefferson's views towards the interpretation of the constitution?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
How did jeffersons views about the constitution implied powers differ from the views of Alexander Hamilton?
Jefferson's views differed from Hamilton's because Jefferson believed that implied powers are the powers that are "absolutely necessary" to carry out expressed powers, but Hamilton thought it meant that they were not expressly forbidden in the Constitution.
How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas Jefferson's views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ?
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
