Not entirely. Judicial review involves the power to declare a law or Executive Order unconstitutional, but the heart of judicial review is analyzing a law or order relevant to a case before the court to determine whether it is in keeping with constitutional principles, both as written and as applied.
A law may be constitutional on its face (as written), but be used in a way that violates the Constitution (as applied). Under these circumstances, the law itself is not declared unconstitutional, but it is prevented from being used in an unconstitutional manner.
Judicial review also applies in the many, more abundant cases where the court analyzes a law and upholds the law against a constitutional challenge.
That power is the power of judicial review.
Judicial Review.
The Judicial Branch had this power. The process in which this branch declare laws constitutional or unconstitutional is called the Judicial Review
The US Supreme Court's ability to declare an Act of Congress unconstitutional arises from the implied power of judicial review.
Judicial review
The name given to the Supreme Court's power to declare a law unconstitutional is judicial review.
Judicial review
The power to declare a law unconstitutional (Judicial Review).
The Supreme Court gained the power to declare laws unconstitutional
None of the three branches of government have more power than the other two. They do, however, have different responsibilities. The judicial branch has the power to declare a law unconstitutional, for example.
The power of the supreme court to declare a law "unconstitutional" is called Judicial Review. No part of the constitution actually grants this power explicitly to the Supreme Court, but the case of Marbury vs. Madison established this power and has been the accepted precedent for granting the Supreme Court the power of Judicial Review ever since.
The Judicial Branch has the power to declare the acts unconstitutional.