Yes, it is possible for Justices to provide a fair review of a case despite the brief presentations from lawyers. They have access to extensive written briefs, legal precedents, and prior case law, which allow them to delve deeply into the issues at hand. Additionally, the oral arguments, while concise, highlight the key points and concerns that the Justices consider when making their decisions. Ultimately, their experience and expertise enable them to analyze complex legal matters efficiently.
Yes, Supreme Court justices are required to be lawyers in order to serve on the bench.
All 112 justices in the history of the US Supreme Court (as of 2011) have been lawyers.
Lawyers.
Lawyers.
Arguing and persuading and fighting for justice and truth
Justice are judges. All current and former justices on the US Supreme Court began their careers as lawyers.
who are the possible employers for fashion design
a bunch believe me that's why i want to be a lawyer. Also im good at arguing. Miley Cirus is so hot!!!!!!!!!! Have you noticed that i have
Defendants are not always truthful with their lawyers. It is important for lawyers to gather all relevant information to provide the best defense possible.
Nominated by the President, and confirmed by the Senate. There are no others. In fact, some of the most famous Justices of the Supreme Court weren't even lawyers. We'd probably be better off today if there were fewer lawyers on the Court.
Well, if you're arguing to a bunch of farmers, you're not going to want to use the same language and examples as you would if you were arguing to a bunch of lawyers, are you? You have to tailor your speech or argument to the audience so you can convince them you're right.
who are the possible employers for fashion design