This has been a strong idea in the Supreme Court as well as the other branches of government. A major problem before the U.S. won its independence was that the British soldiers could ransack a home without any warrant. The U.S. wanted to stray away from this idea of searching without a warrant. However, many situations call for search without a warrant and so the major issue is what needs a warrant and what doesn't.
ANY judge of ANY court can sign and authorize a search warrant.
Warden v. Hayden
No. The US Supreme Court doesn't hold trials; they hear appeals. Sentences are imposed by the trial court.
The 1987 Supreme Court case that supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics is Massachusetts v. Sheppard. In this case, the court ruled that as long as the police officers acted in good faith reliance on the warrant, the evidence could still be used against the defendant.
No knock warrants are something that the Supreme Court has approved in limited situations where it is determined for officer safety, and/or preservation of the evidence that the officer does not have to first knock and announce his presence before serving a warrant.
You can be deported for any felony conviction, and violence history. i dont know what the warrant is for but you need to answer it and stay out of any future trouble.
Yes, a police officer can detain a suspect without a warrant if they have reasonable suspicion that the suspect has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime. This is known as a "Terry stop" based on the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio.
Fingerprinted for WHAT? If they run a criminal history check on you and NV has entered you NCIC, the warrant will show up -OR- if CA checks your criminal status in any of your former states of residence it will likely show up also.
PT warrant is a warrant issued for production of an Accused. P.T. warrant means Prisoner's Transit Warrant.
A federal background check will show all criminal history.
Roosevelt's attempt to appoint more Supreme Court justices to support his reforms
A steagald warrant is a legal document that allows law enforcement to search a third party's property for evidence related to a suspect who is not present at the location. It is used in situations where the police believe that evidence of a crime may be found in a place that is not directly associated with the suspect, such as the home of a friend or relative. The warrant is named after the U.S. Supreme Court case "Steagald v. United States," which established the need for a warrant to protect the Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches.