answersLogoWhite

0

Within their niche and typical operating environment, they would have an upper hand. But as far as force projection capabilities, available mission assets, manpower, etc., they'd find themselves at a serious disadvantage.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Was the Japanese army better than the American army?

No.


Is the British Army better paid than the American army?

YES


How much do Austrailan basketball players get paid?

Less than American players for sure. Around 10k or so.


What specifically did Cornwallis surrender at Yorktown?

Because the American and French surrounded them so they couldn't escape, it was better than killing people on their army. Also because they had a waek army


Who was better the Assyrian army or the Babylonian army?

The Assyrian army was much better than the Babylonian Army, because they had a tactical offensive very well planned.


Does Turkey have a better army than UK?

The British army and the Turkish army has the same strength


Is zsis better than American school?

zaharat alsahraa school is better than american school


How much bigger is china's army than American army?

china's army is about 2 to 3 times bigger than American army


Why was England better suited for war than were the colonies?

The England army were better trained because the colonies army were a bunch of farmers.


Is Army Of Two better then Army Of two 40th Day?

its difficult to compare the two, but i think that army of two got better reviews than 40th day


Why the American army lost Vietnamese army?

The US wasn't beat militarily. However, the limitations imposed on the scope of operations in Vietnam made it into a war of attrition, which the Vietnamese people were better prepared for than the US populace.


Why were the German trenches less miserable than the french trenches?

Generally the German Army was better organized than the French Army; and were overall better able to maintain their field works.