In the 2004 elections, the top 5 PACs by money spent by themselves, their affiliates and subsidiaries were as follows: # EMILY's List $22,767,521 # Service Employees International Union $12,899,352 # American Federation of Teachers $12,789,296 # American Medical Association $11,901,542 # National Rifle Association $11,173,358 According to OpenSecrets.org[6] the top contributors since 1988 ranked by their total spending along with the party tilt of their contributions are 1 American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $39,947,843 Solidly Dem (over 90%) 2 AT&T Inc $39,772, Between 40% and 59% to both parties 3 National Assn of Realtors $33,280, Between 40% and 59% to both parties 4 Goldman Sachs $29,588, Leans Dem (60%-69%) 5 American Assn for Justice $29,520, Solidly Dem (over 90%) THIS IS ALL FROM WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Answer this question… political parties.
The main downside of political action committees is their oppsition to democracy. Answer:their oppsition to democracy
Political action committees
Political action committees.
no
its abbreviation is PAC
DICK
Campaigns
PACs contribute money to re-election campaigns.
how have political action committees invested their money?
the corporate groups can outspend the citizen groups
PAC stands for Political Action Committees. They are the fundraising wing of interest groups.