There is no Constitutional basis for Medicare. Its proponents CLAIM that the Congress's power to "... providefor the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;" [emphasis mine], as enumerated in Article I, Section 8, is the Constitutional authority for Medicare. However, Medicare is clearly targeted at a specific group of people, specifically the elderly, and is denied to anyone who is not a member of that group, and therefore, it has nothing to do with the general welfare.
The above answer is silly. Medicare has successfully survived all court challenges and just because this originator want s Medicare to be unconstitutional, doesn't make it so. The elastic clause of the constitution is quite broad.
I'm sorry, but, where is this "elastic clause"? I'm not aware of Medicare being challenged in court, but if it was, it survived only because the federal courts no longer follow the Constitution, any more than the rest of the federal government.
Fourteenth Amendment
Obama opposes an amendment to the United States Constitution that would ban same-sex marriage. Mitt Romney supports it.
The 14th Amendment of the Constitution gives citizens equality under the law.
Governor Otter is publicly opposed to same-sex marriage and supports a constitutional amendment which bans gay marriages.
I don't believe the twelfth amendment supports the idea any more than the other amendments. The idea of a living constitution is the belief that the constitution must change and evolve as our country does and all the amendments are support of that idea because amendments are change. It also comes from the notion that the constitution is purposely broad so as to leave it open for interpretation and change.
Why did Franklin. Support the constitution
The National Rifle Association (NRA) supports and endorses the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This amendment protects individual gun ownership rights and has been continuously advocated by the NRA.
No. The Tea Party supports an amendment to the United States Constitution banning all legal recognition of same-sex relationships.
I am not sure I understand your question. If you are asking about the First Amendment to the constitution, the president supports it 100%, and has always supported it. In fact, as a professor of constitutional law for 12 years, Mr. Obama taught students all about the importance of the constitution.
Mr. Gosar supports a constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage in the United States.
Mike Huckabee opposes the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry. He supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a partnership between a man and a woman. He also opposes domestic partnership laws.
Senator Thune publicly supports an amendment to the United States Constitution banning same-sex marriage. John Thune: Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. Thune co-sponsored amending the US Constitution to define traditional marriage. "Two-thirds of the people in South Dakota are in favor of protecting marriage through a Federal Marriage Amendment. You know, two-thirds of the people in South Dakota, probably higher than that, are in favor of an amendment to protect the American flag. You know, the Second Amendment, gun owners' rights, abortion - those are not wedge issues in South Dakota."