A drunk must be made accountable if he accidentally burns house because drunkenness is no defense in a court of law.
Put him in a long put 'til he's sober
This question is too broad to be answered. Can you elaborate a little? For example, you might mean: Should government-funded researchers be held accountable? or Should medical trial research be conducted and evaluated by completely disinterested parties? or you might mean: Should scientific research be conducted under the direction of a religious authority?
Accountability for a drunken person's actions, such as accidentally burning down a house, can be complex. While intoxication may impair judgment, it does not necessarily absolve an individual of responsibility for their actions. Legal systems often consider the intent and circumstances surrounding the incident, but ultimately, individuals are generally expected to take responsibility for their behavior, regardless of their state of intoxication. Thus, the man could be held accountable, depending on the specific laws and context of the situation.
yes i think he should be accountable for his actions
They should and are.
yes, I believe that business should be held accountable for there action while conduct business.
you should run like crazy
The security officer or Administrator
The Federal Government.
Because, if we were accountable to no-one, anarchy would rule ! Every site has its own rules. People need to make themselves aware of what is, and is not allowed.
Depends on how you want it and how thick it is... please elaborate.
stop, drop, and roll.