There is a major PRO to managers owning a stake in the company - their performance is tied up to their pay! If the managers are working properly, the company will be doing well and manager's shares will increase in value - the company is happy, the manager is happy and the general shareholder is happy.
It depends on the size of the company and what kind of manager.
I believe thay should have some money invested in the company.
There is a major PRO to managers owning a stake in the company - their performance is tied up to their pay! If the managers are working properly, the company will be doing well and manager's shares will increase in value - the company is happy, the manager is happy and the general shareholder is happy.
Managers owning sizable amounts of common stock can align their interests with shareholders, potentially driving better company performance and decision-making. This ownership can foster a sense of accountability and commitment to the company's success. However, it may also lead to conflicts of interest, where managers prioritize short-term stock performance over long-term sustainability, or engage in riskier behavior to boost share prices. Additionally, excessive concentration of wealth in a single investment can create financial risk for managers.
Only if he wants to afford his own dragon dildo one day
Only if he wants to afford his own dragon dildo one day
I know they export large amounts of Beer. I am not sure if this is their largest export, but it is a sizable one.
It depends on the size of the company and what kind of manager.
The company has a sizable online site, and the contact information is in the related link below.
what are difirent meaning of sizable
Peter forgot about his grief when he learned that his inheritance would be sizable.
Sizeable