The Supreme Court case you’re referring to is likely Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), which dealt with the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law, but it did not address the "separate but equal" doctrine directly. The term "separate but equal" originates from Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which upheld racial segregation under the premise that separate facilities for blacks and whites were constitutional as long as they were equal. This doctrine was eventually overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which declared that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal and unconstitutional.
No
Which of these statements accurately describes the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision of 1896?
he was a judge for the supreme court in separate but equal.
In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. Segregation, the Court said, was not discrimination.
1954
The supreme court in plessy v fergussion based on a theory that separate can be equal but in reality it's not
the court's interpretation of whether the equal protection clause allowed racial segregation
Separate but equal
This does not appear in the constitution, but it was a unwritten practice concerning racial discrimination. Marshall in his argument with the Supreme Court concerning school discrimination of Louise Brown stated that if people are kept separate that does not make them equal, but is unequal and discrimination.
Brown vs. The Board of Education ruled that separate but equal was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court decided that the state governments could legally separate people of different races as long as the separate facilities were equal.
It upheld the "separate but equal" doctrine.