A majority decision is the ruling of a court that reflects the views of more than half of the judges or justices participating in a case, establishing a binding precedent. In contrast, a dissenting decision is an opinion written by one or more judges who disagree with the majority's conclusion, offering an alternative perspective. While majority opinions guide future cases, dissenting opinions can influence legal thought and future rulings, highlighting differing interpretations of the law.
Majority just means most, dissenting is those that disagree, but can be majority or minority depending on if group larger or smaller than one you are speaking about
A majority opinion explains the reasoning behind the courts ruling while a dissenting opinion explains a disagreement with the courts ruling
Majority > 50%, Minority < 50%
the difference is that standard is being used by majority
Decision aid system is for decision making. A support system is a helpdesk.
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
The difference is that decision making usually come first than problem solving.
The primary difference is that a Democracy is run by the majority, while a Republic is run by the law. A Republic prevents the majority from abusing the minority.
the basic difference between them is that in greedy algorithm only one decision sequence is ever generated. where as in dynamic programming many decision sequences are generated.
its stipid qestion jo dik khato
A decision is a selection between two or more things or actions. A desire is thing you want or an action you want to take.
In the landmark case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the dissenting justices were Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justices Tom C. Clark, Potter Stewart, and Byron White. They argued that the majority's decision imposed undue restrictions on law enforcement and could hinder effective crime control. The dissent emphasized the need for a balance between individual rights and the practical realities of police work, suggesting that the ruling could undermine public safety.