0
What else can I help you with?
What supreme court case banned prior restrainsts?
Near v. Minnesota
What was banned as a result of near versus Minnesota?
Prior restraints, where a newspaper was prevented from publishing.
What did the Supreme Court rule in the case Near v Minnesota?
prior restraints, where a newspaper was prevented from publishing
What was banned as a result of near Minnesota?
Prior restraints, under which a newspaper would be prevented from publishing
What was banned as a result of Near v Minnesota?
Prior restraints, under which a newspaper would be prevented from publishing
What was banned as a result of near vs Minnesota?
Prior restraints, under which a newspaper would be prevented from publishing.
How has the supreme court usually dealt with prior restraint cases?
sending the law to court.
What has generally been the supreme courts attitude toward prior restraint?
Supreme Court decisions over the past 75 years clearly support the presumption of the unconstitutionality of prior restraint
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court .?
Having appellate jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court hears cases that have been in trial before. A majority of cases that the Supreme Court hear are either controversial, or some kind of trial error took place in a prior court.
Prior to the passage of the Sixteenth Amendment the Supreme Court had ruled that an income tax was unconstitutional.?
true
What is the Supreme Court term?
United States Supreme Court yearly terms begin the first Monday in October and end the next year prior to the start of the new term, with actual sessions ending in July or June. Supreme Court justices are appointed for life.
What happens when the supreme court refuses to hear an appeal for a case?
When the Supreme Court refuses to hear an appeal for a case, it means that they have denied the request for review. This denial does not establish any legal binding or precedent, and the decision of the lower court stands. The denial by the Supreme Court does not provide an explanation or indicate agreement with the lower court's decision.
