Plessy v. Ferguson
Neighborhoods in the U.S. today have people from different ethnic backgrounds living side by side. This was not true in the 1950's and 1960's when many areas, especially in the south, where segregation was common. There was a form of segregation between the whites and blacks. Segregation was strong during the times of slavery and even after.
republic state
Segregate is already a verb. Other verbs depending on the tense are segregates, segregating and segregated.For example:"They decided to segregate the genders"."The society segregates people"."They are segregating everyone"."They have been illegally segregated".
Segregation is the attempt to keep groups of people of different races, genders, ancestries, etc. separated from each other.
The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.
self-determination
Higher level...the supreme court judges are "justices" other judges are just "judges"
Public Opinion is a huge one. Since the eye of the people is so close on the Supreme Court given the consequences of its decisions, there is evidence that the Supreme Court is affected by the will of the people. Also, amicus briefs can influence Supreme Court votes.
The southern states and their white citizensbelieved they benefited from the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) because the Court's decision allowed them to legally maintain racial segregation like they had under slavery. Many Caucasians believed they were superior to African-Americans, and preferred not to intermingle with people of other ethnic backgrounds.
Jackson ignored Worcester v. Georgia. This was significant because Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court's decision which said that Georgia couldn't make laws that broke the terms on the authority of which the Cherokee's have the right to govern themselves on. Many people ask can he ignore the Supreme Court? Or, Why didn't the Supreme Court do anything about it? And do you know what I would say. idk. :)
The Supreme Court determines what contradicts the Constitution. So it supposedly isn't possible for them to rule against it. If people don't like the decision of the Supreme Court, they can pass laws and/or amend the Constitution to change it. Congress would be who would overrule it, particularly members who were there when they passed whatever law. The Court is not allowed to put words in the mouth of Congress.
"Is" is a verb in the given sentence, as it is the action word expressing a state of being or existence. The other words mentioned — aggregate, congregate, segregate — are also verbs that indicate different actions or processes. Nouns are words that represent people, places, things, or ideas, and in this context, "is" is being used as a verb.