0
What else can I help you with?
Did the US Supreme court rule that juveniles cannot be held in pretrial detention?
No, the Supreme Court did not rule juveniles cannot be held in pretrial detention. It was found that in certain cases, holding the accused despite age would be more logical than to release the individual early.
Why has the supreme court upheld preventive detention?
The short answer is "because it is not intended to be punitive and because it serves a legitimate public interest." In any given case, if one of those is not true, the detention is unconstitutional.
Which amendment says criminal may be kept in jail?
Though it is not mentioned in the Constitution, the Supreme Court has upheld the legality of preventive detention, in which someone who is likely to commit a crime if released can be kept incarcerated. Preventive detention is usually reserved for felons accused or convicted of child molestation and similar charges.
When is there no constitutional right to bail?
The Eighth Amendment has been interpreted to mean that bail may be denied if the charges are sufficiently serious. The Supreme Court has also permitted "preventive" detention without bail. In US v. Salerno, 481, US 739 (1987), the Supreme Court held that the only limitation imposed by the bail clause is that "the government's proposed conditions of release or detention not be 'excessive' in light of the perceived evil."
How many juveniles got the death penalty in 1976?
In 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty after a moratorium, but it ruled that executing juveniles was unconstitutional. Consequently, no juveniles were sentenced to death that year. Prior to this ruling, several juveniles had been sentenced to death, but the focus shifted significantly after the Supreme Court's decision. As a result, the death penalty for those under 18 was effectively banned in subsequent years.
What is In Re Gault 1967?
In re Gault (1967) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that extended due process rights to juveniles in the legal system. The case involved Gerald Gault, a 15-year-old who was taken into custody for allegedly making an obscene phone call, and was sentenced to a juvenile detention center without a formal trial. The Court ruled that juveniles are entitled to certain constitutional protections, including the right to counsel, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to a fair hearing, fundamentally changing the treatment of juveniles in the legal system. This decision underscored the importance of due process in ensuring justice for young individuals.
How did the people react to the decision in US vs salerno?
The reaction to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Salerno (1987), which upheld the constitutionality of preventive detention, was mixed. Supporters argued that it allowed for the protection of public safety by detaining dangerous individuals before trial, while critics expressed concerns about potential abuses of power and violations of due process rights. Many civil liberties advocates feared that this precedent could lead to wider applications of preventive detention, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. Overall, the decision sparked ongoing debates about the balance between public safety and individual rights.
Where does the concept of justiciability originate for the supreme court?
The Constitution
What did the US Supreme Court case Graham v Florida prohibit for juveniles tried as adults?
Graham v. Florida, 560 US __ (2010)(08-7412)The US Supreme Court voted 6-3 that juveniles tried as adults for non-homicide crimes cannot be sentenced to life without possibility of parole.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Was there at any point life with out parole for juveniles?
Until June 25, 2012 there was life without parole for Juveniles in the US. The case is Miller v. Alabama if you want to look it up. In this case the Supreme Court ruled that life without parole was cruel and unusual punishment.In Graham v. Florida (2010) the Supreme Court ruled that life without the possibility of parole was okay if the crime was murder.Unitl 2005 in Roper v. Simmons, juveniles could be put to death.These are the "big three" dates in juvenile law.
What case set forth the idea that the denial of bail and pretrial release to a suspect who may be dangerous is constitutional?
The case that established the constitutionality of denying bail and pretrial release to a suspect considered dangerous is United States v. Salerno (1987). The Supreme Court ruled that the Bail Reform Act of 1984, which allowed for the detention of individuals deemed a danger to the community, did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive bail. The Court held that the government's interest in preventing crime and ensuring community safety justified such preventive detention.
Is it fair to sentence a 13 year old in prison for life without parole?
The Supreme Court has held that sentencing juveniles to life in prison or any other crime than murder was cruel and unusual punishment. Consequently all juveniles who fit this category are being or have been resentenced.
