Donald Trump believes "Stop and Frisk" was a good idea. However, "Stop and Frisk" was ruled unconstitutional and New York City discontinued the practice. "Stop and Frisk" was wrong because it relied on biases about who to stop, examples: young men, young black men.
Even if Trump wants to re-establish this, he cannot because of the court ruling.
It is unconstitutional and against the law because it profiles people.
A stop and frisk is when a police officer stops you in the street and frisks you; much like they do in the Airport. It consists of physically checking your body for weapons or anything else that is illegal.
Independent Sources - 2008 Stop and Frisk 4-24 was released on: USA: 20 June 2012
Avengers Assemble - 2010 Stop and Frisk 3-2 was released on: USA: 17 February 2014
Yes, stop and frisk requires reasonable suspicion that a person has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity. This must be based on specific and articulable facts.
The stop and frisk policy in New York City officially ended in August 2013. This decision came after a federal judge ruled that the policy violated individuals' constitutional rights.
The Awful Truth - 1999 Stop and Frisk Night 2-8 was released on: USA: 12 July 2000
Don't Sleep Hosted by T- J- Holmes - 2012 Stop and Frisk 1-8 was released on: USA: 11 October 2012
your dumb how can you not know this question
The officer may perform a "Stop" when the officer has reasonable suspicion that the suspect may have committed a crime. The officer may perform a "Frisk" when there is a lawful "Stop", along with reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed.
The correct terminology is Stop and Frisk - and the Supreme Court has ruled that if the officer's 'reasonable suspicion' for the stop can be articulated, it is, in fact, legal and proper. See: Terry v. Ohio
edddf