answersLogoWhite

0

He vetoed the bill and sent it back to Congress.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did Jackson do when the bill renew to renew the banks charter came to him for his signature?

He vetoed the bill and sent it back to Congress.


When President Jackson did not renew the charter for the Bank of the US the responsibility of money lending fell to?

When President Jackson did not renew the charter for the Bank of the US the government stated putting money in state banks. Money lending fell on these banks and four anti-bank resolutions were approved.


What did Jackson do when the bill to renew the bank charter came to him for his signature?

He vetoed the bill and sent it back to Congress with the reasons for his veto. His veto was no surprise.


how did Andrew Jackson ruin national bank?

After Jackson vetoed a bill to renew the Chater of the Bank and his veto stood up, he ordered federal funds to be withdrawn from the bank and moved to state banks. This forced the bank to call in loans and severely crippled it before its charter expired.


What happened after the congress renew the charter for the bank of the US?

Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill renewing the charter. Jackson did not favor a strong centralized government, and aimed to prevent a central government-run bank as well.


What happened after congress renew the charter for the bank for the US?

Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill renewing the charter. Jackson did not favor a strong centralized government, and aimed to prevent a central government-run bank as well.


Why did Henry clay try to renew the banks charter four years early?

Henry Clay sought to renew the Bank of the United States' charter four years early in 1832 to leverage the bank's popularity as a political tool in the upcoming presidential election. By pushing for the renewal, he aimed to challenge President Andrew Jackson, who was opposed to the bank and had vowed to dismantle it. Clay believed that the bank's charter renewal could galvanize support for him and highlight Jackson's contentious policies. This strategic move ultimately backfired, as Jackson's opposition to the bank resonated with voters, contributing to Clay's electoral defeat.


Did Andrew Jackson replace the Bank of the US with one large state bank?

No, Andrew Jackson did not replace the Bankof the U.S with one large state bank. Instead he vetoed the charter to renew the bank of the U.S then he took out all of its money and distrubited the money to various state banks.


What did Andrew Jackson do to distory the national bank?

Jackson decided to destroy the bank by transferring about $10 million in government deposits to state banks. Without this money the national bank struggled to survive. Before this Jackson had protested against national banks vehemently and refused to renew the Second Bank's charter. He had also vetoed the bank (well known as the "Bank Veto).


Whose plan was it to re-charter the US bank in 1832?

Nicholas Biddle, the president of the bank, was the main force in getting Congress to renew the charter in 1832 which was an election year. When Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill to renew it, it became a campaign issue.


What was a political consequence of Jackson fight against the National Bank?

Jackson's opposition made the bank charter an issue in 1832 election by pushing a bill to renew its charter through Congress before the charter was due to expire, forcing Jackson to veto it just before the election. The move backfired since Jackson won handily and his influence as President increased.


What did Jackson do after Congress passed a bill to renew the charter of the Second National Bank?

After Congress passed a bill to renew the charter of the Second National Bank in 1832, President Andrew Jackson vetoed it, citing his belief that the bank was unconstitutional and detrimental to the common people. He argued that it concentrated too much financial power in the hands of a wealthy elite. Jackson's veto was significant as it reflected his populist approach and set the stage for a contentious political battle over the role of banking in the economy. Ultimately, his actions led to the demise of the bank and contributed to the rise of state-chartered banks.