democracy
Yes, police officers have a legal obligation to enforce the law as part of their duties to uphold public safety and maintain order in society.
Representative Democracy
Pakistan Is Considered A Islamic Republic/Democracy Where They Have Elections But Enforce Islamic Laws Such As No Pork, Or Alcohol.
The Supreme Court has no power to enforce its own decisions.
direct democracy is each person's decision directly affects the outcome of a vote. Representative democracy is the citizens elect officials to represent them in the government. These elected officials then meet to make the country's laws and to enforce them.
Legally there is no obligation to do so. If the beneficiaries wish to honor verbal requests, they certainly can. The court does have to approve and as long as no one is complaining, they will do so.
Further research may be needed for this, but I have an educated guess: The President of the United States. Just think about how much power the presidents have! They would be like "Kings" If their terms weren't limited to 4 years! 7th Grade Student
§ 6A-3-118 Statute of limitations. - (a) Except as provided in subsection (e), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six years after the accelerated due date. (b) Except as provided in subsection (d) or (e), if demand for payment is made to the maker of a note payable on demand, an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the note must be commenced within six years after the demand. If no demand for payment is made to the maker, an action to enforce the note is barred if neither principal nor interest on the note has been paid for a continuous period of 10 years. (c) Except as provided in subsection (d), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to an unaccepted draft to pay the draft must be commenced within three years after dishonor of the draft or 10 years after the date of the draft, whichever period expires first. (d) An action to enforce the obligation of the acceptor of a certified check or the issuer of a teller's check, cashier's check, or traveler's check must be commenced within three years after demand for payment is made to the acceptor or issuer, as the case may be. (e) An action to enforce the obligation of a party to a certificate of deposit to pay the instrument must be commenced within six years after demand for payment is made to the maker, but if the instrument states a due date and the maker is not required to pay before that date, the six-year period begins when a demand for payment is in effect and the due date has passed. (f) An action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay an accepted draft, other than a certified check, must be commenced (i) within six years after the due date or dates stated in the draft or acceptance if the obligation of the acceptor is payable at a definite time, or (ii) within six years after the date of the acceptance if the obligation of the acceptor is payable on demand. (g) Unless governed by other law regarding claims for indemnity or contribution, an action (i) for conversion of an instrument, for money had and received, or like action based on conversion, (ii) for breach of warranty, or (iii) to enforce an obligation, duty, or right arising under this chapter and not governed by this section must be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrues.
There is no constitutional provision for this question. I'd say that there simply is no legal obligation for the justices to recluse themselves. (Even if there was, there is no higher court to enforce such a rule.)
Secularism holds that none of India's religions can enforce religious laws on the entirety of the country. This protects India's multiplicity of religions from governmental intrusion or repression.
A free market economy would be more likely to be found in a democracy rather than a totalitarian dictatorship because it is is a market in which there is no economic intervention and regulation by the state, except to enforce private contracts.
It depends on the democracy, but generally YES. In some democracies, generally first-past-the-post parliamentary republics like the United Kingdom, the ruling political party controls all major branches of government and, therefore, does not need to compromise with the opposition to pass or enforce laws.