answersLogoWhite

0

It allowed slavery and found Scott to be property.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What reversed the dred scott decision?

13th amendment to the Constitution


What decision was made in the dred scoot v sanford?

Scott wasd denied his freedom. The Court interpreted the Constitution to mean that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, because it said a man's property was sacred, and slaves were property.


How did the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment affect the Dred Scott decision?

The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.


Why were most southerner's pleases with the dred Scott decision?

Because it said slavery was protected by the Constitution.


What did the Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott case say about the expansion of slavery into the territories and the rights of slaves in the US?

The Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott case declared that slaves were not citizens, so they had no rights under the Constitution and no legal standing in court. It also ruled that Congress had no power to ban slavery in the territories, essentially allowing for the expansion of slavery into new regions.


Why was Dred Scott decision a victory for slave owners?

It declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union according to the Constitution.


How does the Dred Scott v Sandford relate to the Constitution?

The Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution as it was understood in 1776 - that a man's property was sacred, and slaves were property. This appeared to mean that no state could declare itself to be free soil.


What was the decision of the supremem court case dred Scott v sanford?

The Court interpreted the Constitution, as they believed the Founding Fathers would have meant. A man's property was sacred. Slaves were property. Therefore slavery was legal in every state of the Union. It added that a black man could not be a citizen of the USA, and could not take a white man to court. So Dred Scott's owners had no case to answer.


What precedent did the dred Scott v Sanford case set?

It simply declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, because of how the Chief Justice interpreted the Constitution.


Why did Dred Scott decision alarm northerners?

It appeared to mean that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and could not be banned from any state of the Union.


The decision rendered in the DRed Scott case was applauded by?

Applauded by the South, who thought its interpretation of the Constitution meant that there was no such thing as free soil.


How The Dred Scott Decision affect slavery?

The Supreme Court denied Scott his freedom on the grounds that slavery was protected by the Constitution. (They judged that the Founding Fathers would have included slaves in their definition of 'property' - which was declared sacred under the Constitution.) This decision infuriated the influential Abolitionists in the North, as much as it delighted the South, and deepened the division between the two sections.