answersLogoWhite

0

The Court interpreted the Constitution, as they believed the Founding Fathers would have meant.

A man's property was sacred. Slaves were property. Therefore slavery was legal in every state of the Union.

It added that a black man could not be a citizen of the USA, and could not take a white man to court.

So Dred Scott's owners had no case to answer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History
Related Questions

What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?


What was the supreme court decision of dred Scott v sanford?

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans were not citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. Additionally, the Court declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, as it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slave owners by depriving them of their property.


What Supreme Court decision overturned both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty?

Dred Scott v. Sanford


What supreme court decision overturned both Missouri compromise and popular sovereignty?

Dred Scott v. Sanford


What Supreme Court decision in effect meant that the Constitution protected slavery?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


What describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states


What is a statement that best characterizes Roger Taney?

He was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.


Which was the Dred Scott v Sanford Supreme Court decision?

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered U.S. citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, stating that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories. This decision fueled tensions leading up to the Civil War.


Who took the Scott vs Sanford case to court?

Dred Scott


Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

The decision made slavery legal in all U.S. territories that were not yet states.


What supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the US?

Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)*Sandford is misspelled in the court documents; the respondent's real last name was Sanford.


Why did the supreme court decision in dred Scott v sanford outrage northerners?

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford outraged Northerners because it ruled that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and that Congress could not ban slavery in the territories. This decision was seen as a blow to the abolitionist movement and reinforced the perception that the federal government was siding with pro-slavery interests.