It depends on the reasons the car was repossessed and what the local laws are. If the car is being held as evidence or to be processed for evidence, it can be held as long as it is needed.
No, a judge cannot refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial. It is their responsibility to consider all relevant evidence in making a fair and just decision.
If the patient's medical records are germaine and vital to the case and can supply needed evidence, the patient cannot refuse to release them - but a court order would be necessary to gain access to them
Because there is no credible evidence to indicate they have.
Refuse to Lose - 2011 was released on: USA: 21 July 2011
They refuse to release demo 0.6 that's what
Since there is no evidence that any queen ever asked him to do anything, I guess the answer is no.
Evidence presented in court is not retained by the court. After the trial is concluded it is returned to the agency (agencies) that supplied it. If you need access to any of it you will have subpoena the agency to release them. If the case is still on-going (in trial, under appeal, etc), evidence in an ongoing case is never released. Your defense attorney had access to the same material, have you checked with them?
Refuse to Lose - 2011 1-10 was released on: USA: 20 August 2011
Refuse to Lose - 2011 1-11 was released on: USA: 20 August 2011
Refuse to Lose - 2011 1-12 was released on: USA: 20 August 2011
Refuse to Lose - 2011 1-13 was released on: USA: 20 August 2011