Taxes are (supposed to be) used towards the public good, to provide services that no one besides government is going to provide because it simply is not profitable. A good example is roads. If the government did not use tax money to build roads, no one else would because there is no profit in it.
Sven Steinmo has written: 'Taxation and Democracy' -- subject(s): Taxation 'Growing Apart?'
no taxation
The justification for progressive taxation lies in its principle of equity and the ability to pay. By taxing higher incomes at increased rates, it aims to reduce income inequality and fund essential public services that benefit society as a whole. This approach is based on the belief that those with greater financial resources should contribute a larger share to support infrastructure, education, and social welfare programs. Ultimately, progressive taxation seeks to create a more balanced economic environment and promote social justice.
No taxation without input from those being taxed
Steven Porter has written: 'America's dying democracy' -- subject(s): Political corruption, Democracy 'Restoring the Foundations of Epistemic Justification' 'The American musical theatre' -- subject(s): Musicals, Production and direction
BIG BOYYY
Ordered,limited and representative government
Kinn Wei Shaw has written: 'Democracy and finance in China' -- subject(s): Finance and taxation
Jingwei Shou has written: 'Democracy and finance in China' -- subject(s): Finance, Public, Public Finance, Taxation
Robert La Follette expanded democracy by championing the "Wisconsin idea" which pioneered Workmen's Compensation and minimum wage legislation. He pushed forward corporate and railroad regulations along with progressive taxation. He favored an expanded political democracy to allow people to move toward economic democracy.
The adjective of justification is justifiable.The adverb of justification is justifiably.
The idea that taxation should be based on the ability-to-pay principle