Officers and enlisted do not interact socially.
It is contrary to the good order and discipline of the military service.
Article 134
Primarily Article 134.
Two thoughts: "Men, don't let this happen to you," and, no fraternization.
The same as any charge made under the UCMJ, the burden of proof is upon the accused. Should you be accused of fraternization by a military authority, it will be necessary for you to prove your innocence.
Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) covers the offense of fraternization. This article prohibits improper relationships between officers and enlisted personnel that compromise the chain of command, order, discipline, morale, or unit cohesion. Penalties for fraternization can range from a reprimand to court-martial.
What article of the UCMJ covers fraternization
Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) covers fraternization. It prohibits relationships between officers and enlisted members that violate prescribed regulations, as well as unprofessional relationships among individuals of different ranks that can affect good order and discipline within the military.
This offense falls under the Punitive Articles of the Uniform Code of Military Jurisdiction (UCMJ), specifically the General Article, #134.
That is covered in Army Pamplet 600-35 - RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOLDIERS OF DIFFERENT RANKS
Article 134 is the primary article. It may also be covered under Articles 80 and/or 92.
no its not bad at all, do it, its fun