The broad language of the Constitution regarding national security can lead to ambiguous interpretations, allowing for varying applications that may not align with contemporary needs. This flexibility can enable the executive branch to assert expansive powers in the name of national security, potentially undermining civil liberties and checks and balances. Furthermore, such vague language can result in conflicts between branches of government, as the judiciary may struggle to adjudicate cases where the limits of national security are unclear. Ultimately, this ambiguity can jeopardize the protection of individual rights while concentrating power in the hands of the state.
what is problematic about the constitutions broad language relative to national security policy
gaining words by comparision
Ulrich Kautz has written: 'Chinese equivalents of German and Englsih relative clauses' -- subject(s): Chinese language, Clauses, Comparative and general Grammar, English language, German language, Syntax, Translating 'Chinese equivalents of German and English relative clauses =' -- subject(s): English language, German language, Relative clauses, Translating into Chinese
Tamil is part of the Dravidian language family, with the closest major relative being the other Dravidian languages such as Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam. These languages share structural similarities and historical linguistic connections.
10-12%
Omwikho is an African Luhya word that means "a relative" in English language.
If you do not speak Kurdish, then, yes. However, the term "foreign" part of foreign language is relative. If you are a native Kurdish speaker, then English is the foreign language.
No. Many people learn sign language simply as another language.
Erling Strudsholm has written: 'Relative situazionali in italiano moderno' -- subject(s): Italian language, Relative clauses
Pali, a close relative of Sanskrit.
national archives
yes they canAdded: Umm-m-m-m ... in most case, yes they can - but under certain circumstances using a relative as a witness could prove problematic - ESPECIALLY if the relative/witness is a beneficiary of whatever it is that they are witnessing. In such case it would probably be best to get an independent witness to your signature.