answersLogoWhite

0

The debate between positivism and post-positivism centers on the nature of knowledge and the role of empirical observation in scientific inquiry. Positivism asserts that knowledge is derived from observable phenomena and that scientific methods can yield objective truths about the world. In contrast, post-positivism acknowledges that while empirical observation is important, it is not infallible; it emphasizes the theory-laden nature of observation and recognizes that knowledge is socially constructed and subject to revision. This distinction highlights differing views on objectivity, the complexity of reality, and the limitations of scientific methods.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the difference between positivist research and post positivist research?

First I would like to refer this issue to epistemology and methodology , which the epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know and the Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature.In inference, I can put it in a short way that, the Positivist is the knowledge of realists to uncover the truth in a proved way and the Post-Positivist is the knowledge which is more concerned with critical realistic way.


How do you know if you are a positivist or a post-positivist person?

To determine if you are a positivist or a post-positivist, consider your views on knowledge and reality. Positivists typically believe that knowledge is derived from observable phenomena and emphasize empirical evidence, while post-positivists acknowledge that our understanding of reality is inherently fallible and shaped by social contexts. If you believe in the possibility of objective truth through scientific methods, you may lean towards positivism; if you recognize the limitations and biases in knowledge, you might identify as a post-positivist. Reflecting on how you approach evidence and the nature of truth can help clarify your stance.


What does post positivist psychology mean?

Post-positivist psychology challenges the traditional positivist view by recognizing the limitations of objectivity and proposing that scientific inquiry should consider subjective experiences and social context. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexity of human behavior and the role of interpretation and multiple perspectives in psychological research.


What is post positivist research?

Post-positivist research is a theoretical approach to research that challenges the strict empiricism and objectivity of positivism. It acknowledges that researchers cannot be completely objective and that facts are influenced by the researcher's perspective and context. Post-positivism allows for a more flexible and interpretive approach to understanding phenomena.


What are the release dates for The Pre and Post Debate Commentary Live - 2014 Post-Debate 1-2?

The Pre and Post Debate Commentary Live - 2014 Post-Debate 1-2 was released on: USA: 4 February 2014


When was Positivist calendar created?

Positivist calendar was created in 1849.


What are the differences between positivist and post posetivist?

Positivism emphasizes scientific objectivity, empirical evidence, and verification, while post-positivism acknowledges the limitations of objective knowledge and recognizes the role of values, perspectives, and interpretations in research. Post-positivism also allows for more flexibility in research methods and the inclusion of qualitative data.


What are the release dates for The Pre and Post Debate Commentary Live - 2014 Pre-Debate 1-1?

The Pre and Post Debate Commentary Live - 2014 Pre-Debate 1-1 was released on: USA: 4 February 2014


Is Post-positivist qualitative or quantitative research?

Qualitative research is generally based on different paradigms (pozitivist, post-pozitivist, constructivist etc.) but Quantitative research is generally based on pozitivism (or newer version of it is post -pozitivizm, for example critical realism).


What has the author Charles I Stubbart written?

Charles I. Stubbart has written: 'Strategic management research in the age of post-positivist turmoil in the social sciences' -- subject(s): Management, Social Sciences, Research


What is the difference between an impromptu debate and an extemporaneous debate?

The answer is: B: In an impromptu debate, participants have much less time to prepare for the debate than in an extemporaneous debate.


What basic principles did the Positivist school of Criminology embrace?

Ultimately, positivist criminology sought to identify other causes of criminal behavior beyond choice. The basic premises of positivism are measurement, objectivity, and causality. Early positivist theories speculated that there were criminals and non-criminals