In the case of Logdon v DPP (1976), the court held that the defendant's actions constituted an assault, even though he did not intend to cause actual harm. Logdon had pointed a replica gun at a woman, which she reasonably believed to be real, leading to her fear of immediate violence. The ruling emphasized that the victim's perception of threat, rather than the defendant's intention or the weapon's actual lethality, determined the existence of assault. Thus, the court affirmed that a threat can exist even if the means to carry it out are not genuine.
no
i know for dpp but not sky for dpp give it happines
Plessy v. Ferguson.
Plessy v. Ferguson.
Director of Public Prosecution
trade from dpp
Plessey v Ferguson
The brown decision contradicted the plessy decision, holding that separate but equal treatment was not really equal
The Brown decision contradicted the plessy decision, holding that separate but equal treatment was not really equal
Truth is... there isn't anything that is as effective for pain. Adcock Ingram will have to work on a replacement without DPP or do independent studies into the effects of DPP. Then maybe, it will be back.
Final Decision - 1997 V is rated/received certificates of: Argentina:13 USA:R
D.P.P is the abbreviation for The Director of Public Prosecution.