The US Supreme Court is not intended to be partisan, but in reality, the Court is often divided by political ideology.
Liberal. Got it out of my govt book, so no link for proof sorry.
Major shifts in opinions result from Presidents appointing justices whose ideology and approach to constitutional interpretation differs from the majority on the court. The Supreme Court's decisions generally reflect the ideology of the majority, and this changes over time.
If by "ideology" you mean a belief in "The Rule of Law," yes. However, taken in any other context, no moreso than in any other decision made by the Supreme Court in strengthening defendants rights.
The Governors of the two states can negotiate an agreement between them. If this fails and it goes to court, the Supreme Court is the court of original jurisdiction for disagreements between States.
Kennedy is considered the "swing vote" on the Court because his conservative ideology is tempered by strong support for individual rights, such as privacy. Otherwise, his function is the same as that of any other US Supreme Court justice.
Progressive Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg succeeded conservative Byron White on the Court, shifting the balance slightly more to the left but not giving the liberal bloc a majority on the bench.
Supreme Court justices are chosen by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Factors that influence the selection process include the nominee's qualifications, judicial philosophy, political ideology, and potential impact on the Court's balance of power.
The Supreme Court has no real checks. Its members serve for life and can make bizarre interpretations of the Constitution that essentially create laws that can not be repealed unless reversed by a later court.
Supreme Court. Because it can overrule all courts.
court , sport
The Court of Law