0
What else can I help you with?
What term refers to military and civilian prepartions for war?
The term that refers to military and civilian preparations for war is what is called Mobilization. ~NS
What is a nonmilitary person?
A person who is not enlisted in the Military is called a Civilian.
What is the name of a world war 2 noncombat female?
If the woman is in the military she is called by her rank. If she is not in the military she is called a civilian.
Can anyone non military related apply for the civillian military jobs?
Yes. They are called civilian military jobs because civilians, or non-military personnel can apply and be hired for them. There are civilian military jobs both overseas and in the US.
What rule is when military authority takes the place of civilian law?
When the military takes control of a civilian government it's called martial law. This happened in the recent past of Egypt, as one example. When this happens, normal government activities such as holding elections and other personal freedoms by a population are usually suspended.
What is it called when you attack both military and civilian resources to destroy your enemy?
Total War.
What is the temporary increase in military rank called?
In US, this is a "brevet" promotion
What is it called when you want to work on ships for the navy and army?
Civilian contractors work on Military vehicles.
Why are they called civilian letter?
"Civilian letters" typically refer to correspondence or communications that are not related to military or government operations. The term emphasizes that the content is intended for civilian audiences, often dealing with personal, social, or commercial matters. This distinction helps clarify the context and purpose of the communication, differentiating it from official military correspondence.
How is a civilian different than a person belonging to the total mobilized force?
A civilian is a non-military individual not actively involved in armed conflict or military service. A person belonging to the total mobilized force is part of the armed forces and may be called upon for military duty or deployment during times of conflict or war.
When a CBRNE event occurs the military is strictly forbidden in responding if civilian teams are already available?
It depends on the specific circumstances and the jurisdiction's protocols, but generally, military involvement in CBRNE (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive) response is typically a last resort when civilian teams are overwhelmed or unavailable. Civilian authorities are usually responsible for initial response efforts, and the military is called upon when additional resources or specialized capabilities are needed.
When does civilian law supersede military law?
Civilian law is typically always in place. Military law is only invoked in extreme emergencies. However, military personnel are always subject to military law. The Adjutant General will negotiate with the civilian authorities if there is any situation where it is not definite as to which takes precedence. Actually, in the United States, no military person (or, for that matter, anyone other than the Judical Branch) can arbitrarily decide to enforce military law in a place where it is not currently in place. Not even the President can decide to apply military law in a place where civil law is currently in force (indeed, this is one of the major contentious issues around the classification of terrorists as "enemy combatants", and the legality of this move is still being subject to litigation). The misnowmer "martial law" does not actually apply Military Law, but rather enforce a certain subsection of civilian law. For instance, let's say that there is major rioting in a city, and the National Guard is called in to restore order, and "martial law" is declared by the city's major (or perhaps, the state governor). Members of the National Guard are subject to Military law, and any infractions they commit will naturally be covered by military trial. HOWEVER, should a National Guardsman capture a looter (or other criminal), they are then prosecuted under CIVILIAN LAW, even though "martial law" was declared. Martial law in this case is a specific subsection of civilian law, which criminalizes certain activities which are normally permissible under ordinary civilian law. Back to the original question: as Congress is the creator of both military and civilian law, it can decide whether civilian or military law applies in a situation where the military normally has first jurisdiction. There are a myriad number of places this can occur, so naming them all is not possible. In addition, the Constitution is still the highest law of the land, and is supreme over both military and civilian law. Do note that many crimes are not covered by military law, but only civilian law, so it is entirely possible for a person normally subject to military jurisdiction to be prosecuted by civilian authorities without military acquiecence. For example, Insider Trading is a civilian crime, with no military equivalent, so it would be entirely possible to charge a military serviceperson on a military base with this civilian crime.
