Frivolous: (adj) of little importance, not worthy for serious attention; not meant seriously Syn: silly, foolish, inane, petty, trifling Ant: serious, important, significant The matter seemed so frivolous after her mom was injured.
I would say that anyone who is a former president of the United States probably qualifies as a "famous person" anywhere in the United States, so yes. Assuming that's the James Madison you meant. If you meant little Jimmy Madison from down the street, then no, not so much.
By interposition, James Madison was referring to the right of states to oppose policies of the federal government that it believes to be unconstitutional. Madison served as the 4th US President.
I meant Vegas :)yes
There is no such language as "Jewish". If you meant Hebrew, it's מדיסון. If you meant Yiddish, it's מאַדיסאָן
I believe that what James Madison meant by republic was this - a country governed by its people rather than by a monarch. No one man should hold all that power.
As many say, James Madison was a tyrannical soldier. His idea of factions meant that the slaves would be allowed to be free. He did this because he feared that slavery would never be abolished.
Dred Scoot v. Sanford
The ecumenical movement refers to the attempt to increase cooperation between religions. Not necessarily blurring the distinctions between them, but increasing tolerance, empathy, and understanding. Ecumenism refers to initiatives designed for that purpose.
stop spying on us Madison or we will tell the police on you. you are stupid and all that stuff we said about u we meant it
"Sobulitity" appears to be a misspelling or a very uncommon term, as it does not have a widely recognized definition in English. If you meant "subtlety," it refers to the quality of being understated or not immediately obvious, often involving fine distinctions or nuances. If you meant something else, please provide more context or check the spelling for clarification.
Justice Lewis Powell's statement emphasized that racial and ethnic distinctions in legal contexts demand a high level of scrutiny to ensure fairness and equality. This means that laws or policies that differentiate based on race or ethnicity must be rigorously evaluated to prevent discrimination and protect civil rights. The intent is to safeguard against unjust treatment and ensure that any such distinctions serve a compelling governmental interest and are narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.