Apex-type question, reworded to preserve answer
When a law is allowed to stand because it is reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.
The reasonableness standard The Supreme Court uses the reasonableness standard to allow laws that may appear (or actually be) facially discriminatory to stand because the law is reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.
The Court will support a state law if it is based on a classification that is reasonably related to a legitimate government interest. This means that as long as there is a rational connection between the classification used by the law and a valid government purpose, the Court will consider the law constitutional.
The reasonableness standard The Supreme Court uses the reasonableness standard to allow laws that may appear (or actually be) facially discriminatory to stand because the law is reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.
Rational basis test
For a government to justify its actions as serving a legitimate state interest, it must demonstrate that its actions are necessary to protect the well-being and security of its citizens, are in accordance with the rule of law, and are proportionate to the threat or issue at hand.
Because its goal is to directly influence legislation, the courts have ruled that limitations on lobbying for interest groups are legitimate.
The reasonableness standard is a legal principle that requires actions or decisions to be justifiable, understandable, and rational based on the circumstances. It is often used in legal contexts to assess whether a person's conduct meets an objective standard of reasonableness.
Cases subject to rational basis review in the legal system typically involve challenges to government actions or laws that are not considered to implicate fundamental rights or suspect classifications. Examples include economic regulations, tax laws, zoning ordinances, and other policies where the government has a legitimate interest in regulating certain activities or promoting public welfare. In these cases, the court will uphold the government action as long as it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest.
To satisfy the rational basis test, the government must demonstrate that a law or regulation is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest. This means that there must be a plausible connection between the means chosen and the ends sought. The burden of proof is on the challenger to show that the law is not rationally related to any legitimate interest, making this test relatively deferential to the government. Essentially, as long as the law is not arbitrary or capricious, it is likely to be upheld.
Stakeholders.
The government passes health and safety laws to protect both employees and the general public. They want to make sure that companies are acting in the best interest of everyone's safety.