The original case of United States v. Nixon involved a dispute over whether President Richard Nixon had to comply with a subpoena to produce tape recordings and documents related to the Watergate scandal. Nixon claimed executive privilege, arguing that the tapes were protected from disclosure. The district court ruled against him, leading to the appeal. The case ultimately centered on the balance of power among the branches of government and the limits of executive privilege.
If the case is 'appealed' the original ruling might possibly be over-turned.
A court case can only be appealed if the Court of Appeals agrees to hear the case.
Not all cases appealed to an appellate court are heard by the appellate court. In such cases the verdict delivered by the lower court of original jurisdiction will stand.
A criminal acquittal generally cannot be appealed by the government.
Any ruling or court case can be appealed. During their review the Court of Appeals will either accept the appeal for consideration, or deny it or, possibly, send it (remand it) back to the original trial court.
No, only trial decisions can be appealed.
Nixon v. United States is not related to the case involving former President Richard Nixon.The Nixon v. US, (1993) ruling listed in United States Reports (the official volumes containing US Supreme Court opinions) is Nixon v. United States, 506 US 224 (1993). This case is not related to former President Nixon, but to an impeached Mississippi US District Court judge, Walter Nixon, who appealed the Senate's impeachment ruling to the US Supreme Court.In that case, the Court determined that impeachment proceedings are non-justiciable, and are political matters, or the province of Congress. The 1993 Nixon case set a formal precedent preventing impeached officials from appealing their impeachment in court.William Rehnquist wrote the opinion of a unanimous Court. Justices Stevens, White and Souter wrote concurring opinions.
That would be the Supreme Court.
No, a new case must be started.
It is considered a final judgment in the case and unless appealed becomes the law of the case.
A court decision can be appealed because the court or the attorneys could have made a mistake in the representation of the defendant or in the presentation of the case. Because court cases are tried by humans who make mistakes, they can be appealed.
The court of original jurisdiction in this case was US District Court for the District of Columbia, presided over by Judge John Sirica.The Judge approved Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski's subpoena on the grounds that neither Executive Privilege nor Separation of Powers between the branches of government were sufficient to abrogate the six accused conspirators' constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause. Nixon was ordered to give Jaworski the tapes.Nixon appealed the decision, but the US Supreme Court ultimately affirmed Sirica's ruling.(Sirica was Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1973)Case Citation:United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)For more information, see Related Questions, below.