What was the concurring opinion in roe v wade?

Answer 1

In Roe v. Wade, the concurring opinion, primarily authored by Justice Potter Stewart, agreed with the majority that the right to privacy encompassed a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. Stewart emphasized the importance of individual liberty and the need for the government to avoid unnecessary intrusion into personal choices. He supported the framework established by the majority opinion, which balanced a woman's right to choose against the state's interests in regulating abortions. The concurring opinion reinforced the notion that the decision should ultimately rest with the individual rather than the state.