The downside of protective legislation for women often included reinforcing traditional gender roles and limiting women's opportunities in the workforce. Such laws, while intended to safeguard women, could lead to discrimination by justifying lower wages, restricting job options, and perpetuating the notion that women were less capable than men. Additionally, these protections sometimes hindered women's autonomy, as they could be seen as infantilizing and undermining their ability to make independent choices. Overall, these laws inadvertently contributed to systemic inequality rather than empowering women.
No, because that is not true
Muller Vs Oregon
Margaret Helen Hobbs has written: ''Dead horses' and 'muffled voices': protective legislation, education and the minimum wage for women in Ontario'
J. Hallsworth has written: 'Commercial employees & protective legislation'
No, Women are not considered a minority as of the new legislation.
Julie Novkov has written: 'Constituting workers, protecting women' -- subject(s): Employment, History, Labor laws and legislation, Law and legislation, Women
Bilingual education legislation
On the Downside was created in 2000.
Baby in this context is not about a child...obviously...maybe women are protective over their children (babies) so they become protective over their boyfriend or husband....I think...
women and children...
Upside Downside was created in 1986.
Downside Up was created in 1978.