0
What were the consequences for president de klerk agrees to hold universal elections?
When President F.W. de Klerk agreed to hold universal elections in South Africa, it marked a pivotal shift towards dismantling apartheid and fostering a multiracial democracy. This decision led to the formal end of apartheid and the release of Nelson Mandela, significantly altering the political landscape. However, it also resulted in increased tensions, violence, and uncertainty during the transition period, as various groups vied for power and influence. Ultimately, the 1994 elections ushered in a new era of governance, with Mandela becoming the country's first Black president, symbolizing hope and reconciliation.
What else can I help you with?
What might be the consequences if the president could fire the vice president?
They can't but, if the president could fire the vice president, this could mean that the person who is the vice president was not the person citizens voted for in the presidential elections. First, that could cause anger amongst people who would feel cheated/betrayed. Secondly, the president could carefully select who they wanted to be vice president so that the vice president agrees with everything the president says, giving more power to the president (turning the vice president into a 'puppet leader').
What is it called when everyone agrees when you vote?
Universal Participation
What might be the consequence if the president could fire the vice president?
They can't but, if the president could fire the vice president, this could mean that the person who is the vice president was not the person citizens voted for in the presidential elections. First, that could cause anger amongst people who would feel cheated/betrayed. Secondly, the president could carefully select who they wanted to be vice president so that the vice president agrees with everything the president says, giving more power to the president (turning the vice president into a 'puppet leader').
Can a senators veto?
No only the president does
Direct source of federal government authority?
Elections are the source of government authority. By voting, the public implicitly agrees to be governed by whoever wins the election.
What does it mean for the majority to rule with respect to the minority?
In a system of majority rule, everyone agrees to abide by the decision of the majority. That is the foundation of the Democratic Process. As an example, the majority of Americans voted for President Obama, and he was voted into office. Some, the minority, did not vote for him, but, by the Democratic Process, embodied in the US Constitution, everyone implicitly agrees that he is the President of the United States. That does not mean that everyone agrees with him, but it does mean that they will support him in his role as President.
will you ever have another good president?
only if a good person agrees to run for President I think Condoleeza Rice would make an excellent President, but she doesn't want the job.
What would happen if Michael Jackson was president?
The world would have a meaning. It would TOTALY AWSOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Who agrees? R.I.P Michael :.(
What is the meaning of the word infavour?
It is not all one word. "In favor" is someone who agrees with something. Such as: "I am in favor of the policies that the President is enacting."
Does Obama think the US is going tofall?
No he does not. And as president, he is committed to helping America remain a strong and successful country. Not everyone agrees with the policies of President Obama, as not everyone agreed with the policies of President Bush; but there is no president who wants America to fall or who believes this will ever happen.
What happens to Boggs in Mockingjay?
Boggs is President Coin's (President of D13) 'right-hand man.' When Katniss agrees to become the Mockingjay, it then becomes Boggs' job to keep her alive.
Does the president have to sign legislations for it to become a law?
yes, under two circumstances, that he likes the idea and that the head of every state agrees, then yes
