The most recent case of this was in 2000, when Democrat Al Gore received the most popular votes (regardless of whether the final result in Florida was correct or not), but Republican George W. Bush won the Electoral College vote. This is an odd case since the US Supreme Court intervened in a dispute over who legitimately won Florida's electoral votes; the Court ruled that the votes could not be recounted to confirm the result. Bush was leading in Florida prior to the recount and therefore received Florida's votes, but if the recount had been completed and if it had resulted in Gore winning Florida (whether this would have happened is unknown), then Gore would have won the Electoral College as well as the popular vote.
The Electoral vote as not agreed with the popular vote in three other instances. These occurred in 1824, 1876, and 1888.
The biggest argument against the electoral college is that the electoral vote does not always reflect the preference of the majority of the population.
the majority vote of the electoral college
electorial college, and that's not a school
The representatives within the electoral college are to cast a vote based on the majority vote of the area they represent.
If you mean the popular vote the answer of no.
A candidate could be elected by having a majority of the Electoral votes, but losing the popular vote. And (at one time) Electors were not bound to vote the same way as the majority in their state had voted.
If there is not majority in the Electoral College, the vote goes to the House of Representatives. The president is then elected by a majority of states representatives.
You can win without getting the majority of the popular vote.
electoral college vote
Yes
A vote in the House of Representatives
Answer this question… a loss in the popular vote and a majority in the electoral college.