Andrew Jackson was the first president to be strongly criticized for this practice and so was the first to be pressed to actively defend it. He was the first President who not a member of the Eastern establishment and so he did considerably more "house cleaning" than his predecessors had done.
Andrew Jackson replaced most of the political patronage jobs with his supporters. Unlike previous presidents, he had almost no supporters that were appointed by his predecessor so he had some cause to make more new appointments.
The president appoints judges to the supreme court. But there are limits on how many, im not sure what those limits are.
Martin Van Buren was a US senator, the secretary of state, the vice-president and the 8th president. He did not hold any other federal positions.
By appointing Article III federal judges to the Judicial Branch, and by granting pardons (may not grant a pardon for an impeachment).
No. If Hillary Clinton had become president, she would not have been able to appoint her husband. As a result of President John Kennedy appointing his brother Robert to be Attorney General, new rules were put in place to prevent family members from being appointed to federal positions.
Both the Executive and the Legislative branches share the power of appointing federal judges. The President will appoint someone, and the Senate has to approve it.
They are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
Congress can impeach the President if he commits a major crime. Congress can override the President's vetoes and Congress must approve of the President's nominations to federal positions, like federal judges.
The "name game" in the context of federal bureaucracy refers to the practice of appointing individuals to government positions based on their political connections or affiliations rather than their qualifications or expertise. This often involves placing loyal supporters or party members in key roles, which can lead to inefficiencies and a lack of accountability within the bureaucracy. The term highlights concerns about meritocracy and the potential for cronyism in government appointments.
No. The President appoints relatively few employees, those who are in high-level, policy-making positions: e.g., cabinet officers and such. Virtually all other Federal employees are in civil service positions.
The most common positions include: President Prime Minister King/Queen Emperor Shah Sultan
Three formal powers of the presidency include the ability to veto legislation, which allows the president to reject bills passed by Congress; the power to appoint federal judges and other officials, ensuring the president's influence in the judicial and executive branches; and the authority to conduct foreign affairs, including negotiating treaties and appointing ambassadors, which positions the president as the key figure in U.S. international relations.