answersLogoWhite

0

A primary goal of socialists is to achieve collective ownership or control of the means of production, aiming for a more egalitarian distribution of resources and wealth. In contrast, supporters of regulated capitalism typically seek to mitigate the excesses of capitalism through regulation while maintaining private ownership and market mechanisms. Socialists prioritize social equality and the elimination of class distinctions, whereas regulated capitalism aims to balance free enterprise with social welfare without fundamentally altering property relations.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are two injustices of capitalism?

Starvation and homelessness. Those are just two.


Why did socialists oppose World War 1?

Socialists and WWIIn fact, the vast majority of socialists in Europe did NOT oppose WWI. Those who did oppose the the war said that that particular war was irreconcilable with fundamental socialist convictions about the 'brotherhood of mankind'. This view was shared in some European countries by a very small number of Liberals. On the whole those socialists who opposed WWI found themselves pushed further and further to the Left and formed the basis of future Communist parties.Please note that in the U.S., where socialism has always been very weak, the situation may have been different.Joncey


Who controls capitalism?

Pure capitalism does not exist, but if it did supply and demand would mainly control it. In most forms of capitalism in the world governments control it in some ways. Companies decide that products to produce and consumers decide which of those products to buy.


What were Mussolini's terror tactics?

he used gifts to those that would kill in order to make his reign better


If a federal agency had long established regulations on a particular topic where could you find those regulations?

== ==


What is kulturkampf?

struggle for civilizationCulture war


Is capitalism the charging of interest on money that is loaned?

Those are two different things. Interest on loans is one small detail of the overall economy. Capitalism is a general theory about how society and money interact.


Tenets of socialism?

Socialism is a philosophy which opposes capitalism, which merely means opposition to the private ownership of productive capital (also referred to as "bourgeois property"). The simplest form is syndicalism, which is the belief that productive capital should be managed democratically by those who work it, but there are many other forms Here's an example to better illustrate socialism and how it differs from capitalism. In capitalism, a wealthy investor (called a capitalist) buys a widget factory. He employs a person to work at building widgets in his factory and pays the worker a fixed amount (called a wage). Profit (that is, revenue minus expenses+worker wages) goes directly to the capitalist. Socialists oppose this system, and here's why; let's say that a worker can build one widget an hour. The widget requires $100 worth of material to build. The worker is paid $10 for that hour of work. At the end of the hour, the worker has produced a widget, which the capitalist sells for, say $150. The capitalist has therefore made a profit of $150-$100-$10=$40 To a socialist, this is highly unjust. Since the materials used to create the widget cost only $100 dollars, this means that $50 of the final value comes from the work done by the worker. However, the worker has only received $10 for his work! The capitalist receives the rest (the $40, which socialists call surplus value.) Socialists believe that this is exploitative. The capitalist, who has done no work to build the widget, has stolen a large chunk of the value of the worker's work, merely because he owns the factory. In fact, socialists believe the exploitation of this relationship is so grievous as to be tantamount to wage slavery. Socialists wish to change this relationship by removing the capitalist from the equation. One method, the aforementioned syndicalism, fixes this by having the workers collectively own the factory. Since there is no capitalist to accumulate profit, each worker would get the full value of his or her work. Another system which is important to mention is "state socialism". This is the system we see in places such as the Soviet Union, where the government owns all productive capital. Many socialists, quite understandably, oppose this system. In fact, many socialists refer to this not as "state socialism", but as "state capitalism", since they view this merely as another form of capitalism, with the exploitation of the private capitalist replaced by exploitation by the government acting as a capitalist. I hope this answered your question, at least somewhat.


How do you use the word wholehearted in a sentence?

Those principles included a wholehearted embrace of capitalism and a rule of law.


Capitalism is called a free-market economy because?

That’s what those who benefit from capitalism want you to think. In reality there is no free market, due to state interference in the economy.


Why do some people think capitalism is the best form of government?

Capitalism is not a form of government. Communism is not a form of government. Socialism is not a form of government. All three of those are economic forms, not forms of government.


Who are there are more provisions to care for in pure communism as opposed to pure capitalism?

Pretty much everyone has better healthcare and welfare under pure communism than under pure capitalism, with the exception of those who are in the top 10% by wealth, because those people can afford their own healthcare out-of-pocket.