The Supreme Court requires a simple majority for a majority decision. Under normal circumstances, this would mean at least five of the nine justices must agree. There have been occasions, however, when fewer than nine justices sat on a case.
The Court requires a quorum of six justices to hear a case. A simple majority of six is only four; therefore, it's important to note the correct answer is "simple majority," not necessarily five.
A majority of the nine Supreme Court justices, which means at least five justices, are typically required to reach a decision in a case.
You need to provide some details regarding the situation. Family court matters rarely reach the Supreme Court (state or federal). However, if a case reached that level and the Supreme Court rendered a decision it could not be 'superseded' by a family court level judgment in the state affected by the decision.
The case Stone v. Graham took about three years to reach the United States Supreme Court. The initial ruling occurred in 1979 when the Kentucky Supreme Court decided the case, and it was subsequently appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari in 1980. The Supreme Court ultimately issued its decision in 1980.
It remained undetermined by a lower court. It slowly moved its way to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court of the United States maintains its own website that includes the decision and written opinion of cases for the past few years. The decision is usually uploaded to the site the same day the decision is issued, and is the best source for up-to-date information. Other sites, such as Oyez.org and Justia have online databases of Supreme Court decisions from the present Term all the way back to the Court's first recorded case. Justia has excellent tools that allow a user to search by case name, year or US Reports Volume number. For more information, see Related Links, below.
Used when a lower court is not clear about the procedure or rule of law that should apply in a case. The lower courts ask the Supreme Court to certify the answer to a specific question matter.
1954
Not by himself. The Chief Justice has different responsibilities from the Associate Justices, but has no more voting power than they do. In order to reach a decision on any case, including one that overturns a previous US Supreme Court ruling, a simple majority of the Justices must agree on a verdict.
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
The Supreme Court gets to decide if they want to hear it. It has to go through the entire legal process first, though.
There are two ways a case can reach the Supreme Court.The first way is by far the most common: A case is first heard by a trial court. If one of the parties doesn't like the outcome, they appeal. The case is then heard by an appeals court, who has the power to overturn the decision of the trial court. The first appeal is a "gimme" - the appeals court hears everyone's appeal. If one of the parties STILL doesn't like the outcome, they can try to appeal again. The Supreme Court, however, does not have to accept every appeal. To appeal to the Supreme Court, you have to write a "petition for certiorari." If they accept your case, we say that the Supreme Court has "granted cert."The second way is very rare: the Constitution gives the supreme court "original" jurisdiction over a narrow class of cases (mostly cases between states or involving ambassadors.) This means that if a case is of that type, the Supreme Court can take it directly, without any trial court. The court almost never accepts a case this way.
Justices reach the Supreme Court through appointment by the President with Senate approval