The underlying question with regard to negligent retention is whether an employer failed to take reasonable steps to prevent harm caused by an employee who was known or should have been known to pose a risk to others. This involves evaluating whether the employer had sufficient knowledge of the employee's past behavior or performance issues and whether they acted appropriately in light of that knowledge. If it is determined that the employer ignored warning signs or did not conduct adequate background checks, they may be held liable for any resulting harm.
The phrase "scant regard" refers to a minimal or insufficient level of attention, consideration, or respect given to someone or something. It suggests a dismissive or negligent attitude, indicating that the subject in question is not valued or prioritized. This term often implies a lack of thoroughness or care in one's approach or evaluation.
The noun form of the adjective 'negligent' is 'negligence'. Negligence means the quality of being indifferent, careless, disregarding, and paying little or no attention to something. Some antonyms of negilgence are regard, interest, attention.
That is completely dependent on the man in question however most men regard them no differently to anyone else no matter what nationality.
If you are asking this question in regard to today's newspaper crossword puzzle, the answer is "atom".
If your question is in regard to a crane's mast, no.
You have to consider the things, or people in question, with regard to some characteristic that is common in both
My first thought with regard to this question. Why would you want to?
Not necessarily, but specifics matter in regard to this question.
This must be a homework question. Not well considering Antinous planned to kill her son.
This is in regard to your question....who is this "Jasck Crawford" guy and what have you got against him?
does sombody know please i really need this question answered
Equality in what regard? Why is the question written in past tense?