The Supreme Court decision in United States v. Nixon reaffirmed the principle of the rule of law, emphasizing that no person, not even the President, is above the law. The Court ruled that President Nixon had to comply with a subpoena to release tape recordings and documents related to the Watergate scandal, establishing that executive privilege does not grant absolute immunity from judicial oversight. This decision underscored the concept of checks and balances within the government, ensuring accountability and transparency.
The Marbury v. Madison decision was important because it established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress. This decision solidified the Court's role as the final authority on constitutional matters, shaping its role in interpreting and upholding the Constitution.
The principle the focused on was called the separate but equal principle.
It gave the Supreme Court powers not granted by the Constitution
What is the principle of the constitution in which people hace the supreme political power in government; also the practice of allowing each territory to decide for itself whether or not allowing slavery
What is the principle of the constitution in which people hace the supreme political power in government; also the practice of allowing each territory to decide for itself whether or not allowing slavery
The principle the court focused on was the principle of racial segregation.
Most students of Constitutional Law are taught the principle that the United States Constitution is the "supreme Law of the Land."
It gave the Supreme Court powers not given by the Constitution.
It gave the Supreme Court powers not granted by the Constitution
To make the final decision of the case.
The excerpt from the Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. Madison establishes the principle of judicial review, asserting that it is the duty of the judiciary to interpret the law and determine its constitutionality. This case concluded that if a law conflicts with the Constitution, it is the role of the courts to uphold the Constitution and invalidate the law. Therefore, the decision reinforced the power of the Supreme Court to check the other branches of government and solidify its role as a co-equal branch in the U.S. system of governance.
The Supreme Court's decision is final, it cannot be "revived" and reheard. However a constitutional amendment that changes the relevant parts of the Constitution would supersede the Supreme Court's decision.